The Court of Appeal says the authorities’ negligence enabled a retiree to sell a company a parcel of land that had already been acquired by the state governmentThe Court of Appeal says the authorities’ negligence enabled a retiree to sell a company a parcel of land that had already been acquired by the state government

Court holds Selangor authorities liable over RM2.5mil sale of land for LDP

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
highway ldpThe disputed land was acquired by the Selangor government in 1994 to extend the Damansara-Puchong Expressway.

PUTRAJAYA: In a ruling that underscores the public’s right to rely on official land records, the Court of Appeal has held the Petaling district land registrar and the Selangor director of lands and mines liable for negligence after a company was duped into buying land that had already been acquired by the state government for a highway.

A three-member bench, led by Justice Alwi Abdul Wahab, ruled that the land authorities must jointly and severally compensate Orient Development Sdn Bhd, together with the seller, retired civil servant Mustafa Kamal Albakri Hassan.

“The land authorities materially contributed to the loss suffered by Orient Development,” Alwi said in a unanimous judgment allowing the company’s appeal against part of the Shah Alam High Court’s decision.

The Court of Appeal found no reason to disturb the High Court’s finding that the land authorities had acted negligently and dismissed their appeal against liability.

It also dismissed Mustafa’s appeal against the High Court’s finding that he had made misrepresentations in the land transaction.

“The evidence is overwhelming, and the High Court was correct in its findings,” Alwi said.

The other judges on the panel were Justices Radzi Abdul Hamid and Meor Hashimi Abdul Hamid.

The Court of Appeal ordered Mustafa to pay RM30,000 in costs and the land authorities RM60,000 in costs to Orient Development. Mustafa was also ordered to pay interest at 5% per annum on the judgment sum from 2013 until full settlement.

Two years ago, the High Court found the land authorities negligent but stopped short of ordering them to pay damages.

Instead, it ordered them to refund the quit rent collected from Orient Development between 2016 and 2020 and declared the sale and purchase agreement void.

The disputed land had been acquired by the Selangor government from Mustafa in 1994 for the extension of the Damansara-Puchong Expressway (LDP).

Despite the acquisition, the land office later issued a title to Mustafa, enabling him to sell the same parcel of land to Orient Development for RM2.5 million on Oct 3, 2013.

Orient Development said it had conducted an official land search before signing the sale and purchase agreement, which confirmed Mustafa as the registered proprietor.

The company also incurred about RM200,000 in legal fees and stamp duty in completing the transaction.

It later discovered that the land had already been acquired by the state government for the LDP, and that Mustafa had received nearly RM303,000 in compensation.

Orient Development sued Mustafa in 2018, alleging fraudulent misrepresentation for inducing it to purchase the land.

A year later, it filed a separate suit against the Petaling district land registrar and the Selangor director of lands and mines, alleging they had breached their statutory duties under the National Land Code by failing to maintain accurate land records.

The company also argued that the authorities had failed to comply with procedures under the Land Acquisition Act 1960, depriving members of the public of accurate information needed to conduct land transactions safely.

S Preakas and Miguel Sequerah appeared for Orient Development, while Syamsul Azhar Ab Aziz and Sasha Nameera Sabtu represented Mustafa.

Senior federal counsel Onn Abd Aziz appeared for the Petaling district land registrar and the Selangor director of lands and mines.

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200xWorld Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

Combine up to 20 World Cup matches in one order

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.